Wiggins v. State of Florida — Post-conviction relief appeal affirmed

Case
Alexander James Wiggins v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
EDWARDS (Rick Scott, 2014); EISNAUGLE (Rick Scott, 2017)
Date Decided
July 9, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-2464
Topics
Post-Conviction Relief, Criminal Procedure, Florida Rule 3.850
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Alexander James Wiggins appealed from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County, presided over by Judge Mark J. Borello. This was a post-conviction relief appeal under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, in which Wiggins, appearing pro se, sought to challenge his conviction. The State of Florida, represented by the Attorney General’s office, opposed the appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s order in a per curiam opinion. The appellate court issued no written opinion explaining its reasoning, issuing only a one-word affirmance. Justices Edwards, Eisnaugle, and Kilbane concurred in the decision.

Key Takeaways

  • The lower court’s order denying post-conviction relief was upheld without opinion
  • Wiggins’ pro se 3.850 petition did not succeed on appeal
  • The decision is not yet final pending any timely motion under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331

Why It Matters

This decision affirms the finality of the trial court’s post-conviction relief ruling. Without a written opinion, the appellate court has provided no explanation for why Wiggins’ claims for relief were rejected, leaving limited guidance on the grounds for affirmance. Practitioners should note that the decision remains non-final during the window for motions for reconsideration.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top