State v. Green — First Circuit orders hearing on out-of-time appeal

Case
State of Louisiana v. Lorenzo Green
Court
Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit
Judge
Wolfe (elected 2020); Stromberg (elected 2024)
Date Decided
August 10, 2026
Docket No.
2026 KW 0681
Topics
criminal appeals, postconviction relief, out-of-time appeal
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Lorenzo Green sought supervisory review from the 20th Judicial District Court in West Feliciana Parish after that court denied his application for postconviction relief. The opinion does not describe Green’s underlying conviction or sentence.

Green’s request concerned whether he lost his right to appeal through no fault of his own. Louisiana recognizes a constitutional right to appeal or other record review in criminal cases when a defendant may be imprisoned or fined.

The Court’s Holding

The First Circuit granted the writ, vacated the denial of postconviction relief, and remanded for an evidentiary hearing. The hearing must determine whether Green is entitled to an out-of-time appeal under State v. Counterman.

The court explained that an out-of-time appeal is required if a defendant establishes that he was not advised of the right to appeal or that defense counsel was at fault for failing to file or perfect a timely appeal. If Green is indigent, the district court must appoint counsel for the hearing. The State may file a response before the hearing.

Key Takeaways

  • A defendant who loses the right to appeal without personal fault may obtain an out-of-time appeal.
  • The district court must hold an evidentiary hearing to decide whether Green meets that standard.
  • An indigent relator is entitled to appointed counsel for that hearing.

Why It Matters

The decision reinforces that postconviction procedure can provide a remedy when a criminal defendant may have been deprived of appellate review because of missing advice or attorney error. It also requires a factual hearing rather than allowing the claim to be rejected without determining why the appeal was not timely pursued.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top