Francois — Fourth District summarily affirmed denial of postconviction relief

Case
Roosevelt Francois v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
CIKLIN (Charlie Crist, 2008); LEVINE (Charlie Crist, 2009); SHEPHERD (Ron DeSantis, 2025)
Date Decided
August 13, 2026
Docket No.
4D2026-1173
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Postconviction Relief; Rule 3.850
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Roosevelt Francois, proceeding pro se, appealed an order denying his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

The challenged order was entered by Judge Martin Samuel Fein of the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County. The Fourth District’s opinion does not describe Francois’s conviction, his postconviction claims, or the circuit court’s reasons for denying relief.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the order denying Francois’s rule 3.850 motion.

The court issued a per curiam decision without analysis, so the opinion establishes no stated rationale beyond affirmance of the circuit court’s ruling. Judges Ciklin, Levine, and Shepherd concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The denial of Francois’s rule 3.850 motion was affirmed.
  • The appellate court provided no factual discussion or legal analysis.
  • The decision was not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s denial of postconviction relief intact. Because the Fourth District issued only an unexplained per curiam affirmance, the opinion supplies no express guidance on the merits of Francois’s claims or the governing postconviction standards.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top