Cooper v. State — Fifth District affirms criminal judgment without a written opinion

Case
Ronny Scott Cooper v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Jay, C.J.; Makar, J.; Edwards, J.
Date Decided
August 20, 2026
Docket No.
5D2024-3513
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance; Florida Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Ronny Scott Cooper appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Marion County in lower-court case number 2019-CF-001050-A. Circuit Judge Peter Matthew Brigham entered the decision under review.

The appellate court’s brief opinion does not identify Cooper’s conviction, sentence, appellate arguments, or the facts underlying the case.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning or addressing any legal issue raised in the appeal. Chief Judge Jay and Judges Makar and Edwards concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the judgment against Cooper.
  • The decision provides no factual discussion or legal analysis.
  • The opinion was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the circuit court’s judgment in place, subject to the stated procedures governing finality. Because the court gave no reasoning, the opinion offers no substantive guidance on the legal issues presented in Cooper’s appeal.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top