Marszalek v. State — Affirmed the postconviction ruling without an opinion

Case
Martin E. Marszalek v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Makar; Edwards; Eisnaugle
Date Decided
September 10, 2026
Docket No.
5D2026-0390
Topics
Postconviction Relief, Rule 3.850, Criminal Appeals
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Martin E. Marszalek appealed from the Circuit Court for Marion County in a proceeding under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Circuit Judge Timothy Thomas McCourt presided below.

Marszalek represented himself on appeal. The State was represented by Attorney General James Uthmeier and Assistant Attorney General Whitney Brown Hartless.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.

The per curiam decision provided no reasoning, factual discussion, or explanation of the issues presented. Judges Makar, Edwards, and Eisnaugle concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the ruling in Marszalek’s Rule 3.850 proceeding.
  • The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation.
  • The decision was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s postconviction ruling in place. Because the appellate court supplied no reasoning, the opinion provides no substantive guidance on Rule 3.850 standards or the merits of Marszalek’s claims.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top