Simmons v. State — Fourth District affirmed the criminal judgment without a written explanation

Case
Jeffrey A. Simmons v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
May; Levine; Caryn Siperstein (appointment info not available)
Date Decided
September 24, 2026
Docket No.
4D2023-2766
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Jeffrey A. Simmons appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County. Circuit Judge George Odom, Jr. presided over the underlying case, numbered 062020CF006241A88810.

The Fourth District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the charges, the trial-court proceedings, the issues Simmons raised, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District affirmed the circuit court’s judgment in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the merits. Judges May and Levine and Associate Judge Caryn Siperstein concurred in the disposition.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fourth District affirmed the judgment under review.
  • The opinion states no facts, legal issues, or rationale for the decision.
  • The decision was not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s judgment in place but offers no written analysis for attorneys to apply in other cases. Its significance is therefore limited to the disposition of Simmons’s appeal.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top