Bodie v. State — affirmed the denial of Bodie’s habeas petition

Case
Quentin S. Bodie v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Forst; Shaw; Lott
Date Decided
September 24, 2026
Docket No.
4D2026-1036
Topics
Habeas Corpus, Criminal Appeals, Summary Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Quentin S. Bodie filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County. Circuit Judge George Odom, Jr. denied the petition.

Bodie, proceeding without counsel, appealed that order to Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal. The State was represented by the Attorney General’s Office.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the order denying Bodie’s habeas petition.

The court issued a per curiam decision consisting only of the disposition and provided no explanation of its reasoning. The opinion therefore establishes that the denial was upheld but does not identify the arguments presented or a substantive legal rule supporting the result.

Key Takeaways

  • The denial of Bodie’s habeas corpus petition remains in place.
  • The appellate court affirmed without a written explanation of the merits.
  • Judges Forst, Shaw, and Lott concurred in the per curiam decision.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Bodie’s appeal in the State’s favor, subject to disposition of any timely motion for rehearing. Because the court supplied no reasoning, the opinion offers no substantive guidance on Florida habeas law beyond its case-specific affirmance.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top