Thompson v. State — Conviction or judgment affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Cortavius K. Thompson v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Black; Smith; Labrit
Date Decided
November 4, 2026
Docket No.
2D2026-0172
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Cortavius K. Thompson appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, where Judge Michelle Sisco presided.

The appellate opinion does not identify the underlying charges, the ruling challenged on appeal, Thompson’s arguments, or the relevant facts.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning or addressing any legal issue in a written analysis. Judges Black, Smith, and Labrit concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s judgment remains in effect.
  • The appellate court provided no factual or legal analysis.
  • The opinion establishes no express holding beyond affirmance of the decision under review.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Thompson’s appeal in the State’s favor but offers no written guidance about the underlying legal questions.

Because the opinion contains only an unexplained affirmance, its significance is primarily case-specific.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top