Show: 1 day 1 week 1 month All
Custom (decided):
Coverage since January 2, 2026

Litigation

1st District Court of Appeal
Uncategorized

In re Sebastian C. — Family Home with Community-Based Programming May Qualify as Less Restrictive Program Under Welfare and Institutions Code Section 875

First District holds that placement in a family member’s home with community-based programming and supervision can qualify as a “less restrictive program” under Welfare and Institutions Code section 875(f), even though the appeal was dismissed as moot after the youth was placed wit

4th District Court of Appeal, Division Three
Uncategorized

People v. Espiritu — Trial Court’s Failure to Recognize Presumptively Invalid Reason for Peremptory Challenge Requires Reversal Under Section 231.7

Fourth District reverses convictions in sexual assault case where the trial court failed to recognize that a peremptory challenge based on a juror’s nursing occupation was presumptively invalid under Code of Civil Procedure section 231.7, holding that defense counsel’s failure to specifi

4th District Court of Appeal, Division One
Uncategorized

People v. Sanchez — Court Correcting Clerical Sentencing Error Cannot Modify Misdemeanor Sentences and Need Not Conduct Full Resentencing

Fourth District holds that a court correcting a clerical error in an abstract of judgment is not required to conduct full resentencing or hear Romero motions, but exceeded its authority by modifying the underlying misdemeanor sentences during the correction process.

4th District Court of Appeal, Division One
Uncategorized

People v. Bradley — Stayed Sentences for Unused One Strike Circumstances and Habitual Sexual Offender Law Are Unauthorized

Fourth District affirms forcible rape and related convictions but holds that stayed sentences based on unused One Strike circumstances and the Habitual Sexual Offender law are unauthorized when the defendant is already sentenced under the One Strike law and Three Strikes law for the same offense.

2nd District Court of Appeal
Uncategorized

People v. Player — Jury’s Not-True Firearm Findings Do Not Collaterally Estop Resentencing Court from Finding Defendant Was Actual Killer

Second District holds that a jury’s not-true findings on personal firearm use and a robbery special circumstance do not collaterally estop a resentencing court from finding the defendant was the actual killer in a Penal Code section 1172.6 hearing, applying People v. Santamaria and joining Peo

2nd District Court of Appeal
Uncategorized

In re Melson — Murder Conviction Vacated for Napue Error and Ineffective Assistance Where Prosecutor Failed to Correct False Eyewitness Testimony

Second District grants habeas petition vacating murder conviction where prosecutor failed to correct false eyewitness testimony about prior police identifications and defense counsel failed to impeach with the witnesses’ actual statements, applying the Supreme Court’s recent Glossip v. O

4th District Court of Appeal, Division Two
Uncategorized

People v. T.B. — ‘Less Onerous Alternatives’ to Court-Ordered ECT Means Medical Alternatives, Not Surrogate-Consent Procedures

Fourth District affirms a trial court order authorizing electroconvulsive therapy for an incarcerated patient with treatment-resistant schizoaffective disorder, holding that ‘no less onerous alternatives’ under Penal Code section 2679(b) refers to medical alternatives, not surrogate-cons

4th District Court of Appeal, Division Two
Uncategorized

Flareau v. Superior Court — Trial Court Abused ‘Residual’ Discretion to Deny Mental-Health Diversion Without Proper Analysis

Fourth District grants writ relief, holding that a Riverside County trial court abused its ‘residual’ discretion under Penal Code section 1001.36 by denying mental-health diversion without proper analysis of the statute’s eligibility and suitability criteria.

1st District Court of Appeal, Division Five
Uncategorized

People v. Alston — Conviction Reversed Where Trial Court Failed to Explain Reasons for Overruling Section 231.7 Objection to Peremptory Strike

First District reverses an attempted-lewd-act conviction, holding the trial court violated Code of Civil Procedure section 231.7(d)(1) by failing to explain its reasons for overruling defense counsel’s objection to the prosecutor’s peremptory strike of a prospective juror.

Scroll to Top