Albright v. State — affirmed the postconviction ruling without a written opinion

Case
Glenn Gay Albright v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Makar; Harris; MacIver
Date Decided
August 18, 2026
Docket No.
5D2026-1652
Topics
Criminal Law; Postconviction Relief; Rule 3.850
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Glenn Gay Albright appealed from a ruling of the Circuit Court for Volusia County in a proceeding under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Circuit Judge Leah Ransbottom Case issued the ruling under review.

Albright was represented on appeal by Tanner Andrews of Tanner Andrews, P.A. The State of Florida made no appearance. The appellate court’s opinion does not describe Albright’s claims, the circuit court’s reasoning, or the underlying criminal case.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling. The decision was issued per curiam, with Judges Makar, Harris, and MacIver concurring.

The court provided no written analysis or explanation for its decision. Accordingly, the opinion establishes only that the ruling under review was affirmed; it does not state a substantive holding concerning any particular postconviction claim.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling in Albright’s Rule 3.850 proceeding.
  • The per curiam decision contains no discussion of the facts, claims, legal standards, or basis for affirmance.
  • The decision was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s postconviction ruling intact. Because the appellate court supplied no reasoning, the opinion offers no guidance on the merits of Albright’s claims or the application of Rule 3.850 in other cases.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top