Berrien v. State — affirmed the criminal judgment without a written explanation

Case
Jevon Tavis Berrien v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
White; Smith; Brownlee
Date Decided
September 8, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-0055
Topics
Criminal Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Jevon Tavis Berrien appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Polk County in lower-tribunal case number 2021-CF-004700. Circuit Judge J. Kevin Abdoney presided below.

The Sixth District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the charges, the trial-court proceedings, Berrien’s appellate arguments, or the State’s responses.

The Court’s Holding

The court affirmed the judgment on appeal.

The per curiam opinion provides no reasoning and identifies no specific legal issue or rule supporting the disposition. Judges White, Smith, and Brownlee concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District left the circuit court’s judgment in place.
  • The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation.
  • The opinion does not disclose the issues raised or establish an articulated rule of law.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Berrien’s appeal in the State’s favor but offers no substantive analysis for attorneys or lower courts to apply in other cases.

Because the opinion states only that the judgment is affirmed, its significance is principally to the parties and the disposition of this case.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top