Background
Shaun Marvin Engram, Jr. appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Orange County in lower-tribunal case number 2021-CF-005262. Circuit Judge Vincent Falcone, III, presided below.
The appellate court’s opinion does not describe the underlying charges, facts, procedural history, issues raised on appeal, or the parties’ arguments.
The Court’s Holding
The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment. The decision was issued per curiam, with Chief Judge Traver and Judges Gannam and Pratt concurring.
The court provided no analysis or explanation for its decision. Accordingly, the opinion establishes only that the judgment under review was affirmed; it does not identify a legal rule or explain the grounds for affirmance.
Key Takeaways
- The Sixth District affirmed the Orange County circuit court’s judgment.
- The ruling was a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation.
- The opinion does not disclose the underlying facts, appellate issues, or basis for the court’s decision.
Why It Matters
The decision leaves the lower court’s judgment in place. Because the appellate court supplied no reasoning, the opinion offers no substantive guidance on the legal issues that may have been presented.