Gustin v. State — Fourth District affirms denial of postconviction motion

Case
Jeff Gustin v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Forst; Klingensmith; Lott
Date Decided
August 20, 2026
Docket No.
4D2026-1416
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Postconviction Relief; Rule 3.850
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Jeff Gustin appealed an order of the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County denying his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Circuit Judge Frank David Ledee entered the challenged order in lower-tribunal case number 062023CF009672A88810.

Gustin represented himself on appeal. The State was not required to appear. The appellate court’s brief opinion does not identify the claims Gustin raised or explain the circuit court’s reasons for denying relief.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the order denying Gustin’s rule 3.850 motion.

The court issued a per curiam decision without analysis. Judges Forst, Klingensmith, and Lott concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The denial of Gustin’s rule 3.850 postconviction motion remains in place.
  • The appellate court provided no reasoning or discussion of Gustin’s claims.
  • The decision was not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Gustin’s appeal by leaving the circuit court’s denial of postconviction relief undisturbed. Because the opinion contains no legal analysis or description of the underlying claims, it offers no substantive guidance beyond the disposition of this case.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top