Hardy — affirmed denial of his sentence-correction motion

Case
Michael Hardy v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Conner (Rick Scott, 2011); Forst (Rick Scott, 2013); Shaw (Ron DeSantis, 2025)
Date Decided
August 13, 2026
Docket No.
4D2026-1002
Topics
Criminal Law; Sentencing; Rule 3.800; Summary Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Michael Hardy, proceeding without counsel, appealed an order denying his motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. The challenged order was entered by Judge Marina Garcia Wood of the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County.

The Fourth District’s opinion does not describe Hardy’s sentence, the arguments raised in his motion, or the circuit court’s reasons for denying relief. The State was not required to appear in the appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the order denying Hardy’s Rule 3.800 motion.

The court issued a per curiam decision without analysis, so the opinion establishes no stated rationale beyond leaving the circuit court’s ruling intact. Judges Conner, Forst, and Shaw concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The denial of Hardy’s Rule 3.800 motion was affirmed.
  • The appellate court provided no factual discussion or legal reasoning.
  • The decision was not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Why It Matters

The decision ends Hardy’s appeal unless further proceedings, including a timely rehearing motion, alter the result. Because the court gave no reasoning, the opinion offers little guidance on the substantive or procedural standards governing Rule 3.800 motions.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top