Lagace — affirmed the criminal judgment without a written explanation

Case
Donald Mathew Lagace v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Makar; Eisnaugle; Harris
Date Decided
August 25, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-2170
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Donald Mathew Lagace appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Lake County in lower-court case number 2020-CF-001012-A. Circuit Judge Heidi Davis presided below.

The Fifth District Court of Appeal’s decision does not describe the charges, underlying facts, procedural arguments, or issues Lagace raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written opinion, so it provided no reasoning and announced no express rule of law. Judges Makar, Eisnaugle, and Harris concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s judgment remains in place.
  • The appellate court did not identify or discuss the issues raised on appeal.
  • The decision provides no written rationale or express legal holding beyond affirmance.

Why It Matters

The ruling ends this stage of Lagace’s appeal with the lower court’s judgment intact. Because the court affirmed without an explanatory opinion, the decision offers attorneys no substantive analysis to apply in other cases.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top