Background
O.L., identified in the caption as the mother, appealed from a ruling of the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County in a matter involving the Florida Department of Children and Families and other appellees. Circuit Judge Yery Marrero entered the ruling under review.
The Third District’s opinion provides no factual history, description of the circuit court’s ruling, or account of the parties’ arguments.
The Court’s Holding
The Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling in a per curiam opinion.
The court supplied no reasoning, addressed no specific legal issue, and announced no rule of law. The opinion states only: “Affirmed.”
Key Takeaways
- The circuit court’s ruling remains in place.
- The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation.
- The opinion does not disclose the underlying facts, the issues raised on appeal, or the basis for affirmance.
Why It Matters
The decision ends this stage of appellate review by leaving the circuit court’s ruling undisturbed. Because the Third District provided no analysis, the opinion offers no explanation of how the court evaluated the record or the parties’ legal arguments.