Riccobono v. State — affirmed the criminal judgment without a written explanation

Case
Derek Alexander Riccobono v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
TRAVER, C.J. (Ron DeSantis, 2023); Wozniak, J. (Ron DeSantis, 2023); Kamoutsas, J. (Ron DeSantis, 2025)
Date Decided
October 6, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-0096
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Derek Alexander Riccobono appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Lee County in lower-tribunal case number 2017-CF-017733. Circuit Judge Bruce Kyle entered the ruling under review.

The Sixth District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the charges, facts, procedural history, appellate arguments, or specific order challenged.

The Court’s Holding

The court affirmed the circuit court’s judgment in a per curiam decision.

The opinion provides no reasoning, addresses no legal issue expressly, and cites no authority. Chief Judge Traver and Judges Wozniak and Kamoutsas concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the judgment against Riccobono.
  • The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation.
  • The opinion establishes no express rule of law and does not reveal the grounds for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the lower court’s judgment intact but offers practitioners no substantive analysis of the appellate issues. Because the court did not explain its reasoning, the opinion provides no guidance beyond the result in this case.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top