Rogers v. State — Fifth District affirmed without explanation

Case
Joshua D. Rogers v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Lambert; Eisnaugle; Boatwright
Date Decided
September 17, 2026
Docket No.
5D2026-0411
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Rule 3.800; Summary Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Joshua D. Rogers appealed from the Circuit Court for Duval County in a proceeding identified by the Fifth District Court of Appeal as a “3.800 Appeal.” Circuit Judge R. Anthony Salem presided below.

The opinion does not describe the underlying facts, the issue Rogers raised, or the nature of the circuit court’s ruling.

The Court’s Holding

The Fifth District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.

The court issued a per curiam decision without explaining its reasoning. Judges Lambert, Eisnaugle, and Boatwright concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The appeal arose from a proceeding identified as a Rule 3.800 appeal.
  • The Fifth District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The opinion provides no facts, legal analysis, or explanation of the issue presented.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but offers no reasoning for attorneys or lower courts to apply in other cases. Its significance is therefore limited to the disposition of Rogers’s appeal.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top