Background
Nathan Michael Allsop appealed from a judgment of the Jackson County Circuit Court in criminal case number 22CR37204. The trial court proceedings were before Judge pro tempore Paul D. Moser.
The Court of Appeals’ memorandum opinion does not describe the charge, underlying facts, procedural history, or arguments raised on appeal. The case was submitted without oral argument on June 16, 2026.
The Court’s Holding
The Oregon Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment. Its disposition cited State v. Probst, 339 Or 612, 124 P3d 1237 (2005), without further analysis.
Because the opinion provides no explanation beyond that citation, it does not identify which rule from Probst controlled or elaborate on the court’s reasoning.
Key Takeaways
- The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment against Allsop.
- The court relied on State v. Probst and supplied no additional reasoning.
- The decision is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion under ORAP 10.30 and may be cited only as that rule permits.
Why It Matters
The decision resolves Allsop’s appeal but offers no new precedential guidance. Attorneys should consult State v. Probst and the appellate briefing to determine the specific issue presented and the basis for affirmance.