State v. Atkinson — Oregon Court of Appeals affirmed without a written analysis

Case
State of Oregon v. Robert James Atkinson
Court
Oregon Court of Appeals
Judge
Tookey, Presiding Judge; Kamins, Judge; Jacquot, Judge
Date Decided
September 23, 2026
Docket No.
A184842
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Summary Affirmance; Nonprecedential Opinions
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Robert James Atkinson appealed from a judgment of the Linn County Circuit Court in case number 24CR19526. Circuit Judge Michael B. Wynhausen entered the judgment under review.

The Court of Appeals’ memorandum opinion does not describe the underlying facts, charges, assignments of error, or arguments presented on appeal. The case was submitted to the appellate court on August 24, 2026.

The Court’s Holding

The Oregon Court of Appeals affirmed the circuit court’s judgment. The court resolved the appeal per curiam and cited State v. Noe, 242 Or App 530, 256 P3d 166 (2011), without providing additional reasoning.

The memorandum opinion does not separately identify the legal issue decided or explain how Noe applied. It is designated nonprecedential under ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as permitted by ORAP 10.30(1).

Key Takeaways

  • The Court of Appeals affirmed the Linn County Circuit Court’s judgment.
  • The court relied on State v. Noe but supplied no further legal analysis.
  • The memorandum opinion is nonprecedential and subject to ORAP 10.30’s citation restrictions.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the trial court’s judgment intact but offers no new precedential rule or extended guidance for future cases. Its practical significance is therefore principally limited to the parties and to whatever citation use ORAP 10.30 permits.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top