California Case Summaries
Show: 1 day 1 week 1 month All
Custom (decided):
Clear all
Coverage since January 2, 2026

California

U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
Uncategorized

Salazar Juarez v. Abdi — S.D. Cal. Allows Eighth Amendment Excessive-Force Claim Over ‘Hot Metal Plate’ Incident at RJD to Proceed

After IFP screening of an amended complaint by a state prisoner experiencing a mental-health crisis, the court allowed his Eighth Amendment excessive-force claim to proceed against two correctional officers who allegedly held him against a hot metal plate causing severe burns, but dismissed his deli

U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
Uncategorized

Tolentino v. Andes — S.D. Cal. Denies Habeas Stay-and-Abey as Moot After California Supreme Court Denies State Petition

After the California Supreme Court denied a state habeas petition while the federal stay-and-abey motion was pending, the magistrate judge denied the stay request as moot, finding that the petitioner had now fully exhausted his federal claims because they were substantially equivalent to claims pres

U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
Uncategorized

Abdi v. California — S.D. Cal. Dismisses Habeas Petition Challenging Vehicle Code Conviction Because Driver’s License Suspension Is Not ‘In Custody’

The court dismissed a federal habeas petition challenging a California Vehicle Code infraction for lack of jurisdiction, ruling that a 30-day driver’s license suspension is a collateral consequence of conviction that does not satisfy 28 U.S.C. § 2254’s requirement that the petitioner be

U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
Uncategorized

Baez-Diaz v. United States — S.D. Cal. Denies §2255 Motion Despite Counsel’s Sentencing-Guideline Miscalculation

After holding an evidentiary hearing, the court denied a federal prisoner’s motion to vacate his sentence for ineffective assistance of counsel, ruling that even though his lawyer miscalculated the sentencing guidelines before trial, the petitioner could not show prejudice because he had alrea

Scroll to Top