California Case Summaries
Show: 1 day 1 week 1 month All
Custom (decided):
Coverage since January 2, 2026

California

2nd District Court of Appeal, Division One
Uncategorized

People v. Heaps — UCLA Gynecologist’s Convictions Reversed Where Trial Court’s Ex Parte Communications With Jury Deprived Defendant of Counsel

Second District reverses convictions of former UCLA gynecologic oncologist James Heaps, holding the trial court’s ex parte communications with the jury through a judicial assistant — without notifying counsel — deprived defendant of counsel at a critical stage and the prosecution failed to pro

4th District Court of Appeal, Division Three
Uncategorized

Siam v. Superior Court — Trial Court Erred in Denying Mental-Health Diversion by Overriding Sole Expert and Relying on Unsupported Findings

Fourth District grants writ relief, holding that an Orange County trial court applied the wrong legal standard and relied on findings unsupported by substantial evidence when denying mental-health pretrial diversion to a defendant diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia.

4th District Court of Appeal, Division Two
Uncategorized

Harmon v. Superior Court — Public Defender Has Discretion to Decline Appointment to Habeas Petitioner Under Government Code Section 27706(g)

Fourth District grants writ relief, holding that Government Code section 27706(g) gives a public defender discretion to decline appointment to represent a habeas petitioner — including a Racial Justice Act claimant — without showing unavailability.

U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
Uncategorized

Salazar Juarez v. Abdi — S.D. Cal. Allows Eighth Amendment Excessive-Force Claim Over ‘Hot Metal Plate’ Incident at RJD to Proceed

After IFP screening of an amended complaint by a state prisoner experiencing a mental-health crisis, the court allowed his Eighth Amendment excessive-force claim to proceed against two correctional officers who allegedly held him against a hot metal plate causing severe burns, but dismissed his deli

1st District Court of Appeal, Division Four
Uncategorized

In re Thai — Indeterminate-Life Inmates Not Constitutionally Entitled to Same Conduct Credits Toward Youth-Parole Eligibility as Toward Standard Parole

First District denies habeas relief, holding that CDCR may constitutionally permit only educational merit credits — and not other prison conduct credits — to advance an inmate’s youth-parole eligibility date under Penal Code section 3051.

U.S. District Court — Northern District of California
Uncategorized

Moore v. De La Cruz — N.D. Cal. dismisses habeas claim of free-standing actual innocence as not cognizable under Herrera

Judge Martínez-Olguín dismisses with prejudice the freestanding actual innocence claim in Maria Moore’s federal habeas petition challenging her California first-degree murder conviction with special circumstances, holding that the U.S. Supreme Court has not yet recognized a free-standing innocence c

U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
Uncategorized

Tolentino v. Andes — S.D. Cal. Denies Habeas Stay-and-Abey as Moot After California Supreme Court Denies State Petition

After the California Supreme Court denied a state habeas petition while the federal stay-and-abey motion was pending, the magistrate judge denied the stay request as moot, finding that the petitioner had now fully exhausted his federal claims because they were substantially equivalent to claims pres

1st District Court of Appeal, Division Four
Uncategorized

People v. Cagle — Court Affirms Mentally Disordered Offender Recommitment Despite No Actuarial Risk Tool

First District affirms a one-year extension of a mentally disordered offender’s commitment at Coalinga State Hospital, holding the patient forfeited his due-process and equal-protection challenges to the lack of an actuarial risk-assessment tool, and that any instructional error was harmless.

U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
Uncategorized

Hernandez v. Allison — E.D. Cal. Recommends Denying Habeas Petition Challenging California Criminal Threats Conviction and Lesser-Included Instruction

Eastern District of California recommends denying a habeas corpus petition by a state prisoner serving 25 years to life, holding that the absence of clearly established Supreme Court law requiring a jury instruction on attempted criminal threats in a non-capital case forecloses federal habeas relief

U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
Uncategorized

Abdi v. California — S.D. Cal. Dismisses Habeas Petition Challenging Vehicle Code Conviction Because Driver’s License Suspension Is Not ‘In Custody’

The court dismissed a federal habeas petition challenging a California Vehicle Code infraction for lack of jurisdiction, ruling that a 30-day driver’s license suspension is a collateral consequence of conviction that does not satisfy 28 U.S.C. § 2254’s requirement that the petitioner be

U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
Uncategorized

Baez-Diaz v. United States — S.D. Cal. Denies §2255 Motion Despite Counsel’s Sentencing-Guideline Miscalculation

After holding an evidentiary hearing, the court denied a federal prisoner’s motion to vacate his sentence for ineffective assistance of counsel, ruling that even though his lawyer miscalculated the sentencing guidelines before trial, the petitioner could not show prejudice because he had alrea

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Davis v. Smith — C.D. Cal. Denies Habeas Petition, Discovery, and Evidentiary Hearing After Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation

Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett accepted a magistrate’s recommendation denying a § 2254 habeas petition, denying additional discovery under Bracy v. Gramley because the petitioner already possessed the only evidence he sought, and denying an evidentiary hearing because the alleged facts would not

U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Uncategorized

Crossley v. Diaz Garcia — C.D. Cal. Issues OSC on Venue Transfer of Section 1983 Suit Over Kern Valley Prison Incident

Magistrate Judge Daniel S. Roberts ordered a pro se prisoner plaintiff to show cause why his § 1983 suit over a Kern Valley State Prison incident should not be transferred to the Eastern District of California, where the prison and all defendants are located.

Scroll to Top