Duhart v. State — convictions affirmed, but assault sentence must merge with attempted murder sentence
Case Demitri Anwar Duhart v. State of Maryland Court Appellate Court of Maryland Judge Berger; Zic; Eyler, James R. (Senior
Case Demitri Anwar Duhart v. State of Maryland Court Appellate Court of Maryland Judge Berger; Zic; Eyler, James R. (Senior
The Ninth Circuit held that AEDPA deference barred habeas relief because no Supreme Court case clearly prohibited the midtrial juror removal at issue.
Juvenile Sentence Allowing Release at 65 Was Not Life Without Parole.
This unpublished memorandum disposition reinforces the Ninth Circuit’s application of Jessup v.
A federal district court in California denied a state prisoner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition because the allegedly late-disclosed Brady material about the lead detective was not material, and it declined to issue a certificate of appealability.
The First District Court of Appeal reversed three convictions for nonforcible lewd acts committed in 1993–1994 because the six-year statute of limitations expired two decades before prosecution began, and section 799’s unlimited limitations period was not triggered because Brown could not cons
Case Anthony J. Damiano v. State of Florida Court Florida Second District Court of Appeal Judge LaRose; Silberman; Guard Date
United States v. Vargas: Knowing appeal waiver forecloses sentencing challenge.
The court granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss without leave to amend on three independent grounds.
The First District reversed the denial of Gary Owens’s new-trial motion because Juror No. 7 intentionally concealed his biological mother’s shooting death and withheld his unsettling contacts with Owens’s only defense witness, leaving a substantial likelihood of actual bias that the prosecution did
The Court of Appeal vacated a $300 restitution fine and remanded for the trial court to consider an excessive fines objection under the California Supreme Court’s intervening decision in People v. Kopp, while otherwise affirming the judgment.
California’s Second District Court of Appeal reversed Julia Mildenberger’s misdemeanor conviction concerning eight puppies because the evidence did not show she left them in dangerous conditions overnight, but affirmed her conviction concerning outdoor cats, upheld the dependent-support
The Fourth District Court of Appeal denied Travis Sterling Merritt’s petition for rehearing and modified its opinion to state that his first strike offenses for four counts of robbery were committed when he was 17 years old, while expressly stating that the modifications do not effect a change
The Court of Appeal affirmed Hayes’s convictions but vacated his 50-years-to-life third-strike sentence and remanded for full resentencing because aggravated battery by gassing was not a serious or violent felony and no jury finding supported treating it as one.
The Fourth District Court of Appeal, Division One, affirmed Aaron Jahrootz Steele’s convictions arising from a shopping-center confrontation, rejected his severance and due-process challenges, and left reversal of a separate threat conviction and any retrial or resentencing to a concurrently i
The Third District Court of Appeal affirmed Balaji Balu’s conviction and 24-year prison sentence for 10 lewd acts on a minor, rejecting challenges to jury instructions on the statute of limitations’ corroboration requirement, the standard of proof, expert testimony on child sexual abuse
The Court of Appeal vacated Steele’s count 6 conviction because his lawyer unreasonably failed to request a mistake-of-fact instruction supported by substantial evidence, while denying his Racial Justice Act claim without prejudice to refiling in superior court.
The First District Court of Appeal affirmed a juvenile disposition requiring adult supervision for A.T.’s contact with minors, including his younger sisters, because his concealed abuse of a young cousin supported child-protection and rehabilitation interests while supervised family contact re
The Superior Court affirmed suppression of a firearm because police detained a juvenile based only on an incomplete match to a generic description.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court vacated a summary contempt conviction because an offensive courtroom remark did not significantly obstruct or delay the proceeding.
The Utah Court of Appeals affirmed a murder conviction because evidence permitted the jury to reject perfect and imperfect self-defense, and denied a rule 23B remand because undiscovered violence evidence was not tied to the defendant’s knowledge when he stabbed the victim.
Case Jaime Jose Gutierrez v. State of Oklahoma Court Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals Judge Musseman, Vice Presiding Judge Date
Case United States of America v. Steville D. Burns Court U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Judge COLLOTON,
Case United States of America v. Alexander Miguel Laykovich Court U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Judge Julia