The Indiana Court of Appeals reversed suppression because the objective circumstances did not restrict Hoffman’s movement to the degree associated with formal arrest.
The Indiana Court of Appeals held that a knowing failure-to-appear warrant qualified as an interstate detainer, but refused dismissal because the prisoner did not strictly follow the IAD request process.
The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed a Level 3 felony neglect conviction, holding that any error in admitting a diabetic child’s prior hospitalizations was harmless given extensive independent evidence.
The Indiana Court of Appeals held that witness testimony supplied an adequate chain of custody and that laboratory evidence identifying marijuana with more than 1% delta-9 THC supported the conviction.
The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed stalking and perjury convictions based on a years-long campaign of false property claims despite repeated court rulings.
The Indiana Court of Appeals dismissed the State’s post-acquittal appeal because it sought fact-bound review of a directed verdict rather than presenting a legal question preserved in the trial court.