The Fourth Department affirms County Court’s acceptance of a grand jury report under CPL 190.85 recommending the removal of a City Court Judge for misconduct in office, rejecting challenges to the grand jury proceedings.
The Fourth Department dismissed a district attorney’s Article 78 petition seeking to overturn a court order barring re-presentment to a grand jury and denying unsealing under CPL 160.50(1), holding that unsealing applications are civil in nature and cannot be challenged via Article 78.
The First Department affirms the defendant’s criminal conviction and sentence, addressing evidentiary and sentencing challenges.
The First Department affirms the defendant’s criminal conviction after reviewing the appellate claims.
The First Department affirms the defendant’s criminal conviction, finding the challenges raised on appeal to be without merit.
The First Department affirms the defendant’s criminal conviction, addressing challenges to the proceedings and sentence.
The Third Department affirms the defendant’s conviction in a detailed opinion addressing multiple appellate claims regarding evidence, trial proceedings, and constitutional issues.
The Third Department affirms the defendant’s conviction and addresses multiple issues regarding trial proceedings and evidentiary rulings.
The Third Department affirms the defendant’s criminal conviction, conducting a thorough review of evidence sufficiency, trial court rulings, and constitutional claims.
The Third Department affirms the defendant’s criminal conviction, addressing challenges to the evidence, trial proceedings, and sentencing.
The Third Department affirms the defendant’s conviction after conducting a comprehensive review of multiple appellate claims including evidentiary, procedural, and constitutional challenges.
The Third Department affirms the defendant’s criminal conviction upon a jury verdict, addressing evidentiary and procedural challenges raised on appeal.
The Third Department dismisses a challenge to the Elmira Police Department Property Clerk’s determination regarding seized property.
The Third Department upholds an administrative determination by the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision in an Article 78 proceeding, finding it supported by substantial evidence.