Show: 1 day 1 week 1 month All
Custom (decided):
Coverage since June 8, 2026

Criminal Procedure

Wyoming Supreme Court
Uncategorized

Hughes v. State — Plea Agreement “Sentencing Cap” Is a Non-Binding Recommendation, Not a Stipulated Sentence Under W.R.Cr.P. 11(e)(1)(C)

The Wyoming Supreme Court unanimously affirmed consecutive sentences for a former Casper police officer who pleaded guilty to five counts of aggravated assault and battery following a prolonged armed standoff, holding that a plea agreement capping the State’s “sentencing argument” was a non-binding recommendation under W.R.Cr.P. 11(e)(1)(B)—not a stipulated sentence under 11(e)(1)(C)—and that Wyoming district courts need not make specific findings when deviating from a sentencing recommendation.

North Carolina Court of Appeals
Uncategorized

State v. Havens — Hidden Bathroom Cameras Convictions Upheld; 1978 Privacy-Intent Element Does Not Limit Current Secret Peeping Statute

The North Carolina Court of Appeals affirmed convictions for secret peeping, second-degree sexual exploitation of a minor, and third-degree sexual exploitation of a minor arising from hidden charging-block cameras installed in bathrooms, holding that the 1978 “intent to invade privacy” gloss from In re Banks does not apply to the elements of the current N.C.G.S. § 14-202(f) felony secret-peeping statute.

Texas Court of Appeals, Seventh District (Amarillo)
Uncategorized

Nichols v. State — Threats Relayed Through Crisis Negotiators Satisfy Aggravated Assault on Public Servant; Felony Deadly Conduct Is Not a Lesser-Included Offense When Indictment Charges Exhibiting, Not Discharging, a Weapon

The Seventh Court of Appeals affirmed a fifteen-year conviction for aggravated assault on a public servant, holding that threats relayed through crisis negotiators to officers on scene satisfy the statute, and that felony deadly conduct is not a lesser-included offense of aggravated assault by threat where the indictment charges only exhibiting — not discharging — a weapon. The court modified the judgment to delete an attorney’s fees provision entered without the required finding of financial resources.

Texas Court of Appeals, Seventh District (Amarillo)
Uncategorized

McGruder v. State — Defendant Who Refused Court-Ordered Sanity Evaluation Cannot Complain of Its Denial on Appeal

The Seventh Court of Appeals affirmed convictions after holding that a defendant who refuses a court-ordered sanity evaluation waives any right to such an evaluation and cannot complain on appeal of its denial, and that a December 2022 incompetency finding was legally irrelevant to the separate question of the defendant’s sanity at the time of the offenses.

Massachusetts Appeals Court
Uncategorized

Commonwealth v. Carvalho — Driving Dump Truck with Raised Body Establishes Probable Cause for Negligent Operation Without Evidence of Erratic Driving

The Massachusetts Appeals Court reversed the dismissal of a negligent operation complaint against a dump truck driver who forgot to lower the truck’s raised body before driving under a highway overpass, holding that the vehicle’s dangerous condition — not erratic driving — established probable cause under G. L. c. 90, § 24 (2) (a).

Scroll to Top