Commonwealth v. Jackson — Loaded-firearm offense requires knowledge
The Massachusetts Appeals Court held that carrying a loaded firearm while intoxicated requires proof the defendant knew the weapon was loaded.
The Massachusetts Appeals Court held that carrying a loaded firearm while intoxicated requires proof the defendant knew the weapon was loaded.
The Indiana Court of Appeals held that children on other floors were physically present for felony domestic battery because they might hear the attack and the defendant knew it.
The Nevada Supreme Court upheld state bans on machine guns and auto-sear-equipped firearms but reversed a duplicative modified-firearm conviction under double-jeopardy principles.
The Massachusetts SJC held that sending a secretly taken intimate image only to the person depicted is not dissemination under General Laws chapter 272, section 105(c).
The Nevada Supreme Court held that the graduated-sanctions statutes apply to sentences imposed after July 1, 2020, while allowing courts to consider earlier nontechnical violations when later technical violations occur.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner’s constitutional challenge to Act 40’s SEPTA special-prosecutor regime.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that a DUI defendant’s violation of an ARD condition does not automatically require termination from the diversion program.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court vacated a theft-by-deception conviction because prosecutors never proved that omitted business information affected the defendant’s Section 8 benefits.
A divided Indiana Court of Appeals held that misdemeanor contributing to delinquency does not require proof that the defendant knew the recipients of alcohol were under eighteen.
The Indiana Court of Appeals held that the criminal restitution statute does not authorize reimbursement for a victim’s rental-car expenses.
The South Carolina Supreme Court held that the execution-secrecy statute does not cover public or nonconfidential identifying information and does not punish its later repetition.
The Superior Court held that SORNA II’s nonpunitive Subchapter I requires registration by an offender who began lifetime registration under Megan’s Law II, even though his offense predated Pennsylvania’s registration statutes.
The Commonwealth Court held that a dog attack is without provocation when, under all surrounding circumstances, the victim could not reasonably foresee that her conduct would trigger the attack.
The Nevada Supreme Court held that NRS 200.471 permits a separate assault conviction for every person intentionally placed in reasonable fear of immediate bodily harm.
The Utah Supreme Court held that compulsion is an excuse, not a legal justification, and therefore cannot support the murder statute’s special-mitigation defense.
The Wyoming Supreme Court held that asking a child to touch an adult’s exposed genitals can support attempted sexual exploitation under the statute’s masturbation category.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that an inventory search conducted after an overdose victim entered paramedics’ care was independent of the emergency call and fell outside statutory medical-amnesty protection.
The Supreme Court modified and affirmed. Under the facts and statutory text, Williams remained a lawful occupant for purposes of N.C.G.S. § 14-51.2 even after exiting the vehicle during the confrontation. He was entitled to the presumption instruction, and the failure to give it was prejudicial.
The Superior Court discharged a risking-catastrophe conviction because reckless driving did not create the extraordinary, widespread danger the statute requires, while affirming evading arrest on foot.
The Utah Court of Appeals held that retaining stolen property can continue until possession ends, making the prosecution of a stolen skid steer timely.
A divided Utah Supreme Court held that a prosecutor may file a delinquency petition after an ineligible minor received a nonjudicial adjustment from probation.
The Wyoming Supreme Court reversed a contempt order against the Wyoming Boys’ School for refusing to admit an alleged delinquent juvenile before adjudication. The court held that Wyoming law expressly prohibits pre-adjudication placement at WBS, which is a reformatory for adjudicated delinquents — not a juvenile detention facility — and that the juvenile court abused its discretion by ordering such placement. All three exceptions to the mootness doctrine applied, allowing the court to reach the merits despite the case having been resolved below.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court reversed the Commonwealth Court and held that “skill game” devices—electronic gaming terminals marketed as legal skill-based alternatives to slot machines—are “slot machines” under the Gaming Act and prohibited “gambling devices” under the Crimes Code, with a 120-day stay giving operators time to adjust before enforcement resumes.