Bussey — appeal dismissed as barred by prior appeals
Case Arthur Bussey v. The State Court Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Judge Not specified Date Decided
Case Arthur Bussey v. The State Court Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Judge Not specified Date Decided
Case United States of America v. Maurice Mitchell Court U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Judge Duncan; Oldham;
The Third Circuit held that the Speech or Debate Clause does not bar two federal assault counts based on alleged physical acts by Rep. LaMonica McIver, while remanding a broader third count for additional analysis.
Case State of Louisiana v. Benjamin J. Hart Court Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit Judge McClendon, C.J.; Hester, J.;
The Indiana Court of Appeals upheld a DNA warrant, rejected a mistrial claim, and found circumstantial evidence sufficient to prove breaking in a 2003 cold case.
The Ninth Circuit affirmed a felon-in-possession conviction but vacated the sentence because protected legal challenges were used against acceptance credit.
The court affirmed. Juvenile-probation revocation determines whether the young person violated conditions of an existing disposition; it is not a prosecution imposing punishment for a new offense. Like adult probation revocation, it therefore does not place the probationer in jeopardy for the alleged conduct and does not prevent a later delinquency adjudication based on that conduct.
The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the conviction. Its lengthy opinion rejected Brown’s asserted errors after reviewing the circumstances of the operation, the shooting, the proof of Brown’s knowledge and intent, and the trial court’s challenged rulings. The court concluded that none of the preserved issues required reversal and found no plain error adversely affecting Brown’s substantial rights.
The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed. Although some nonhearsay evidence connected Hatfield to the vehicle or scene, none connected him to the criminal conduct itself. The crucial identification link depended on hearsay. Alabama’s revocation standard is less demanding than proof beyond a reasonable doubt, but a finding still cannot rest solely on hearsay evidence.
The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the capital-murder and first-degree-assault convictions and their sentences. It concluded, however, that the conviction for discharging a firearm into an occupied vehicle violated double-jeopardy principles because the proven act underlying that offense was also used to establish the charged form of capital murder.
The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed. The deputy’s account relayed statements made by other people and did not provide nonhearsay proof that Wallace committed domestic violence. Evidence establishing surrounding circumstances or explaining the investigation was not enough unless some admissible evidence connected Wallace to the alleged violation itself.
The Wyoming Supreme Court held that witness intimidation is a specific-intent conduct offense, affirmed Walker’s convictions, and remanded to correct illegal misdemeanor sentences.
Case United States of America v. Christopher Essameddin Birry, a/k/a Christopher Essam Birry Court U.S. Court of Appeals for the
The Ninth Circuit held that defense counsel violated a California defendant’s autonomy by conceding the conduct underlying a criminal-threats charge despite his insistence on innocence.
The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed a felony-murder conviction, rejecting Batson, causation, abandonment, and Appellate Rule 7(B) challenges.
The Indiana Court of Appeals ordered post-conviction relief because counsel’s failure to support a Criminal Rule 4(B) motion cost the defendant mandatory dismissal.
The Fourth District allowed a second magazine-importation prosecution because a later-discovered purchase receipt supplied essential proof unavailable despite due diligence.
The Court of Appeals reversed. Although evidence supported some findings about the witnesses’ conduct, the supported findings did not show a flagrant constitutional violation that irreparably prejudiced Cuadra’s preparation of his defense with no available remedy other than dismissal. The case was remanded for further proceedings that may include a new trial; a concurrence emphasized the availability of lesser sanctions such as a mistrial.
Case State of Iowa v. Rueben Lee Hickman Court Iowa Court of Appeals Judge Buller, P.J.; Langholz, J.; Bower, S.J.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that impeachment-related errors involving a jailhouse informant did not undermine confidence in a capital verdict and vacated an order granting a new trial.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that an inventory search conducted after an overdose victim entered paramedics’ care was independent of the emergency call and fell outside statutory medical-amnesty protection.
The Indiana Court of Appeals held that a probation petition identifying a new criminal case gave adequate notice when that case later produced the conviction used to revoke probation.
The First District held that a juvenile’s amnesia did not establish incompetence where he otherwise understood the proceedings and could assist counsel.
Case State of Washington v. Alex Kevin Baranyi Court Washington Court of Appeals, Division One Judge Bowman, A.C.J. Date Decided