Brown — Colorado Supreme Court upheld strict-liability hit-and-run convictions and habitual-offender sentence
Case Jason P. Brown v. The People of the State of Colorado Court Colorado Supreme Court Judge Justice Gabriel; Justice
Case Jason P. Brown v. The People of the State of Colorado Court Colorado Supreme Court Judge Justice Gabriel; Justice
Case United States of America v. Nicholas Joseph Peterson Court U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Judge KELLY;
The California Supreme Court reversed a reinstated capital judgment because a hearing held 19 years later could not reliably determine the defendant’s competency at trial.
The California Supreme Court affirmed Kevin Pearson’s death judgment and held that any Senate Bill 1437 error was harmless given the jury’s valid findings and his conduct.
Applying State v. Chambers, the Supreme Court rejected a case-by-case constitutional test. The statute is constitutional when its two safeguards are observed: the alternate must not have discussed the case and the reconstituted jury must begin deliberations anew. The Court reversed on substitution, held the suppression issue unpreserved, and remanded for remaining issues.
The Supreme Court reversed and concluded that McGirt knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived counsel. The written requests, extended history with appointed counsel, and trial court’s questioning showed an unequivocal choice and awareness of the consequences. Because waiver resolved the appeal, the majority did not need to decide forfeiture by misconduct.
The Supreme Court affirmed. Because the record available during the direct appeal was adequate to litigate the asserted deficiencies and prejudice, Gupton was in a position to raise the claims then. His later motion could therefore be rejected under N.C.G.S. § 15A-1419 rather than decided through a new evidentiary proceeding.
The Supreme Court narrowed the reach of the per se-prejudice rule associated with State v. Harbison. Reading Florida v. Nixon, Strickland, and Cronic together, it held that most claims based on an unconsented concession require proof of deficient performance and prejudice; automatic prejudice is reserved for circumstances in which the defendant is entirely surprised by counsel’s concession. It reversed the remand for an evidentiary hearing.
Case State of Kansas v. Terrance Isaiah Sims Court Kansas Supreme Court Judge Per Curiam Date Decided August 14, 2026
Case Roy Christopher West v. United States of America Court U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Judge SUTTON
A published California decision holds that probation officers cannot impose juvenile electronic monitoring without judicial review and clear standards.
The Ninth Circuit upheld a California death sentence, finding the state court reasonably rejected claims involving counsel, competency, and intellectual disability.
The Massachusetts SJC affirmed a first-degree murder conviction, holding that counsel reasonably avoided first-aggressor evidence and that a planned fight did not warrant a sudden-combat instruction.
The First Department held that calculating incarceration tolling for predicate-felony status is ministerial and does not require a jury under Erlinger.
Case Reginald L. Chapman v. Eileen O’Neill Burke Court U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Judge SCUDDER (Donald
Case Reginald L. Chapman v. Eileen O’Neill Burke Court U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Judge SCUDDER (Donald
The California Supreme Court affirmed the judgment in full. The majority concluded that the trial court did not commit reversible error in jury selection or the conduct of either phase and that the evidence supported the convictions, special circumstances, and penalty determination.
The Superior Court held that a constitutional attack on Philadelphia’s public-carry statute was waived and could not be recast as a nonwaivable illegal-sentence claim.
Case State of Oregon v. Timothy Scott Burkeen Court Oregon Court of Appeals Judge Joyce (Kate Brown, 2022) Date Decided
Case State of Oregon v. Alex Gerkin Court Oregon Court of Appeals Judge Joyce (Kate Brown, 2022) Date Decided August
A defendant’s absence from a pretrial competency hearing did not require reversal because his presence would not have contributed to the hearing’s fairness.
Probation terms allowing warrantless property searches did not clearly authorize officers to conduct a suspicionless search of a probationer’s phone photographs.
Case State of Louisiana v. Lorenzo Green Court Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit Judge Wolfe (elected 2020); Stromberg (elected
The Massachusetts SJC held that a coordinated foot pursuit seized a suspect before he discarded drugs, but upheld the stop based on preexisting reasonable suspicion.