Criminal Cases
Show: 1 day 1 week 1 month All
Custom (decided): –
Clear all
Coverage since January 2, 2026

Criminal

Uncategorized

The People v. Marvion Templeton — Traffic stop was not unlawfully prolonged because officers developed reasonable suspicion of drug-impaired driving

California’s Second District Court of Appeal affirmed Marvion Templeton’s firearm conviction, holding that an officer’s observations during a lawful registration stop supported further investigation and that Templeton forfeited his separate challenge to the search of a pill bottle.

Uncategorized

People v. Garcia — Sentence affirmed because the trial court permissibly found aggravating circumstances outweighed statutory mitigating factors

The Fourth District Court of Appeal, Division Two, affirmed Tizoc Garcia’s 26-year sentence, holding that the trial court understood its duties under Penal Code section 1385 and did not abuse its discretion by finding that Garcia’s recidivism and other aggravating circumstances outweighe

Uncategorized

People v. Hrbac — Court of Appeal Affirms Conviction, Upholding Admission of Uncharged Sexual Offense Evidence and Finding Any Instructional Error Harmless

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed Robert Hrbac’s judgment of conviction for continuous sexual abuse of a child, holding the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of uncharged sexual offenses under Evidence Code section 1108 and that any error in failing to in

Uncategorized

Igor Lyakhovestskiy v. Markwayne Mullin, et al. — Federal Court Denies Amended Habeas Petition Challenging Mandatory Immigration Detention and Arrest Without Warrant Claims

A federal district court denied a Ukrainian lawful permanent resident’s amended habeas corpus petition, finding his fentanyl possession conviction triggered mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(c) and that he was served with an administrative warrant upon transfer to ICE custody.

Uncategorized

Richard Edward Dougherty v. Warden Robert Brown — Federal Prisoner’s Challenge to SHU Placement Not Cognizable Under § 2241 Because Success Would Not Necessarily Accelerate Release

A magistrate judge recommended dismissing a federal prisoner’s § 2241 petition for lack of jurisdiction because his challenge to a 307-day SHU placement would not necessarily lead to immediate or earlier release, so his claims belong, if at all, in a § 1983 action.

Uncategorized

Roberto Ordonez Martinez v. Warden T. Valdez — Federal Habeas Petition Appears Time-Barred Under AEDPA; Petitioner Ordered to Show Cause

A federal magistrate judge ordered a state prisoner to show cause why his habeas petition should not be dismissed as untimely, finding it was filed years after the one-year AEDPA deadline expired and that no statutory tolling, equitable tolling, or actual innocence exception appeared to apply.

Scroll to Top